BEHAVIOR CLASSIFICATION OF CONTROL UNIT OF SYSTEMS

Context. The behavior of the system is included in basic concepts that characterize its functioning. In an event-driven system, modeled using a state machine. Known classifications take into account genus and type automaton. At same time, modern systems, control automata are integrated hierarchies have number new properties not reflected their classifications.
 Objective. purpose work to systematize forms specifying systems methods for changing process use. novelty proposed classification lies taking types non-binary, semantic, controlled changeable individual structures these automata.
 Method. essence presented as ambiguity reactions input signals automaton, which manifests itself certain pattern states outputs. When classifying behaviors, expediency exploratory determined. Such ways achieving goal adaptation, change or absorption environment, goals noted. According level complexity behavior, with predetermined, regulated, organizing, predictable autonomous distinguished. Along automaton model importance modeling form combination statements describing possible emergency A system’s terms constancy variability proposed. structure principles implementation within framework processes external selfgovernment described. Based on concept arity functional technological finite singled out. As part by formation, switching, combinational automatic states, well contours activity typical hierarchy, described.
 Experiments. With use features, devices monitoring power transformer parameters, object temperature hierarchical analyzed.
 Results. describes directions complex according 13 main 84 detailing facilitates designing highlights capabilities.
 Conclusions. actual problem systematization has been solved. Classification features give standard solutions simplifies reduces structure.